Legal Opinion

Emerich v. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1998No. 52-54 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

We granted allocatur limited to the issues of one, whether a mental health professional has a duty to warn a third party of a patient’s threat to harm the third party; two, if there is a duty to warn, the scope thereof; and finally, whether in this case a judgment on the pleadings was proper.

This admittedly tragic matter arises from the murder of Appellant’s decedent, Teresa Hausler, by her former boyfriend, Gad Joseph (“Joseph”). At the time of the murder, Joseph was being treated for mental illness and drug problems. Appellant brought wrongful death and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Bradley Center, Inc. v. WessnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. McKeeman v. Corestates Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. R.W. v. ManzekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Seebold v. Prison Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Estate of Witthoeft v. KiskaddonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API