Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 2019No. 37 EAP 2017PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dougherty

I. Background

We granted discretionary review to determine whether the Commonwealth Court erred in holding appellant Daniel Harmon was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Section 402.6 of the Unemployment Compensation Law (the Law), 43 P.S. § 802.6(a) ("[a]n employe shall not be eligible for payment of unemployment compensation benefits for any weeks of unemployment during which the employe is incarcerated after a conviction"). We hold appellant, who was serving a sentence of incarceration on weekends only, was not disqualified from receiving unemployment…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. A.S. v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. 2303 Bainbridge, LLC. v. Steel River Bldg SystemsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. C. Sadler v. WCAB (Philadelphia Coca-Cola)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. 2303 Bainbridge, LLC. v. Steel River Bldg SystemsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. C. Cunningham v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Commonwealth v. Strunk, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API