Legal Opinion

Picotte v. Mills

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1918PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Greene Circuit Court. — Hon. Guy 1). Kirby, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, P. J.

— This is an action for money had and received, the object being to recover back money paid by plaintiff to defendant under a mistake. The plaintiff had judgment and the defendant appeals assigning numerous errors. It will be quite impossible within the confines of an ordinary opinion to state all the facts and discuss in detail the twenty odd distinct propositions of law, many of them with several subdivisions, contained in appellant’s able and painstaking briefs. We have examined these briefs with care but can only discuss such phases of the case as seem to us most important.

Objection was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mayer v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Frost v. FrostSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Livingstone v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Griffith v. TownleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  5. Hume v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. KohmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. New York Life Insurance v. GilbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Berry v. Continental Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. ReaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API