Legal Opinion

Berry v. Continental Life Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1931PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNipper, J.

This is an action whereby the plaintiff seeks to recover $2,000, the alleged value of a policy of life insurance, plus profits apportionable to said policy amounting to $177.41.

The petition is in the usual form.

Defendant, in its answer, after a general denial, alleges that on the 7th day of September, 1909, plaintiff made and signed a written application to the St. Louis National Life Insurance Company of St. Louis for a $2,000, twenty-payment cumulative twenty-year settlement life insurance policy, with an annual premium of $63; that, upon the receipt of said application, the St. Louis Life…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Albany City Savings Institution v. . BurdickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Griswold v. HazardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Buck v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. New York Life Insurance v. GilbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Consolidated American Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Baldwin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  3. Kopff v. Economy Radiator ServiceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Neary v. General American Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. McCormick v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API