Legal Opinion

Livingstone v. Murphy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 10, 1905PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This is a bill to reform a mortgage deed. While its allegations, especially with reference to the existence and nature of the agreement under which the mortgage was given, are somewhat defective and might perhaps be held insufficient as against a special demurrer, still, in the absence of such a demurrer, the bill may be construed as setting out in substance that there was an agreement between the plaintiff on the one hand, and the mortgagor, Margaret J. Murphy, and her husband, James H. Murphy, on the other, that the mortgage should cover the entire interest both of the husband and wife in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griffith v. TownleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  2. Hayward v. CainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Weed Sewing Machine Co. v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. Baker v. MasseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Reggio v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Pearson v. MulloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Stoneham Five Cents Savings Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Richardson v. Lee Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. J. P. Eustis Manufacturing Co. v. Saco Brick Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API