Legal Opinion
Company Doe v. Tenenbaum
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 31, 2012No. Civil Action No. 8:11-cv-02958-AWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REVISED MEMORANDUM OPINION
Alexander Williams, Jr., United States District Judge
Plaintiff Company Doe initiates this action against the following Defendants: (1) Inez Tenenbaum, in her official capacity as Chairwoman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission; and (2) the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Plaintiff asserts four related claims under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). Concerning its APA claims, Plaintiff contends that the Commission’s decision to publish a report implicating Plaintiffs product in the death of an infant who used it is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jake's Fireworks Inc. v. United States Consumer Product Safety CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Jake's Fireworks Inc. v. United States Consumer Product Safety CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Rise for Animals v. VilsackDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Rtskhiladze v. MuellerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025