Legal Opinion

Rise for Animals v. Vilsack

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 21, 2024No. 8:22-cv-00810Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND RISE FOR ANIMALS, et al., * Plaintiffs, * v. * Case No. 8:22-cv-00810-JRR TOM VILSACK, Secretary of the United * States Department of Agriculture, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Rise for Animals (“Rise”) and Animal Legal Defense Fund (“ALDF”) are nonprofit organizations focused on advancing the interests of animals. (ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 6, 12.) Specifically, Rise seeks to end the suffering of nonhuman primates used in research, and works to educate the public, lawmakers,…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API