Studiengesellschaft Kohle, M.B.H. v. Shell Oil Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge,
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas determined that claims 1-6 and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 4,125,-698 (’698 patent) are invalid, and that infringement of claim 13 by Shell Oil Company’s (Shell) polypropylene operations and infringement of claims 7, 9-12, and 15 by Shell’s polybutylene operations were not properly before the court. Studiengesellschaft Kohle m.b.H. (SGK), the owner of the ’698 patent, appeals these decisions. Further, the district court certified the following question under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (1994):
Where the Court has found…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Norman v. Apache Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Raymond Keith Foster, Keith Mfg. Co., and Keith Sales, Co. v. Hallco Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Olof A. HallstromCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc. v. Zebco Corporation and Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Flex-Foot, Inc. And Van L. Phillips v. Crp, Inc. (Doing Business as Springlite)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Gen-Probe Incorporated, Plaintiff-Cross v. Vysis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Alpine Electronics of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.