Legal Opinion

Albert Shields, Jr., Heir of Albert Shields, Sr. v. United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1983No. 81-3120PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:

Appellant class, approximately 200 applicants for allotments under the 1906 Alaska Native Allotment Act, appeal a district court decision holding that the Allotment Act requires the applicant to establish personal, rather than ancestral, use and occupancy of the land prior to its withdrawal for national forests. We affirm.

I

In 1906 Congress passed the Alaska Native Allotment Act, Pub.L. No. 171, 34 Stat. 197 (amended 1956, repealed 1971), which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to grant Alaska Natives allotments of up to 160 acres. In 1956 Congress amended the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Andrus v. Glover Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Jacobson v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Patagonia Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Williams v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. The Alaska Fish And Wildlife Federation And Outdoor Council, Inc., v. Frank L. DunkleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Gilmore Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  4. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Luggage & Leather Goods Manufacturers of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API