Legal Opinion
Patagonia Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 5, 1975No. 73-2432PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before ELY and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and WEIGEL, * District Judge. ELY, Circuit Judge:
This case presents several difficult questions concerning the proper interpretation and application of the grandfather proviso that appears within section 4(a)(2) of the Bank Holding Company Act, as amended (hereinafter “the Act” ), now codified as 12 U.S.C. § 1843(a)(2) (1970). Section 4(a)(2) was enacted as a part of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970 (hereinafter “the 1970 Amendments”), Pub.L.No.91-607, 84 Stat. 1760.
Patagonia Corporation, the petitioner, is an Arizona based, one-bank…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Investment Company Institute v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Committee for Auto Responsibility v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Kratz v. KratzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Hawkins v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Young Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Iowa Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Mary L. FAGNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health & Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.