Gilmore Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
MALETZ, Senior Judge:
In this action plaintiff Gilmore Steel Corp. challenges the government’s rescission of a notice initiating an antidumping proceeding, as well as its dismissal of plaintiffs antidumping petition. The crux of the parties’ dispute focuses on the phrase “on behalf of an industry” contained in section 732(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, 19 U.S.C. § 1673a(b) (1982). Section 1673a provides in part:
§ 1673a. Procedures for initiating an antidumping duty investigation(b) Initiation by petition (1) Petition requirements
An…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Suramerica de Aleaciones Laminadas, C.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- National Juice Products Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Badger-Powhatan, a Div. of Figgie Intern. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.