Legal Opinion

Manchester Manufacturing Co. v. Polk

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1902PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Nottingham. City court of Macon. May 8, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

Polk, a minor, by bis next friend instituted an action against the manufacturing company to recover damages for personal injuries. He alleged that the corporation owned and controlled a cotton factory; that on a named date, while he was an employee and servant of the company and under its direction and control, he was injured in working in defendant’s factory, without fault on his part, by the negligence of defendant, in not furnishing proper machinery, and. because the company, with knowledge thereof, permitted the machinery to get out of repair, and failed, after reasonable notice, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. RyleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Rhodes v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Wynne v. ConklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Faith v. MassengillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Banks v. Schofield's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Callahan v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Butler v. Atlanta Buggy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. McLarty v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API