Legal Opinion

Wynne v. Conklin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Master and servant. Infants. Negligence. Before Judge 'Van Epps. City court of Atlanta. March term, 1890. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandeord, Justice.

The declaration of the plaintiff in error alleged that, he was employed by the defendant in error to work in and about his tin-shop, to do such work as might be required of him by his employer; that he was thirteen years of age, and had been put to work by the defendant upon a large and heavy machine, known as the “square shears” for cutting tin ; that he was too young and small to work this machine properly and safely; 'that while in the course of his employment, after he had finished his work for his employer, he went to the machine and was cutting out some trinket for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rhodes v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Betts Co. v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Wynn v. City & Suburban RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Bare v. Crane Creek Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Manchester Manufacturing Co. v. PolkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. McIntyre v. Empire Printing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API