Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Rylee
Supreme Court of Georgia
Evidence. Negligence. Infancy. Charge of court. Railroads. Before Judge Van Epps. City court of Atlanta. September term, 1890. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, Justice.
Maud Rylee, by her next friend, brought her action, against the defendant for damages. So far as specifically enumerated, the facts in the declaration (excluding certain mere conclusions therein stated and which, in connection with the specific facts alleged, made the declaration good against a demurrer) were substantially proved aud were as follows : The defendant company' had a yard in which it left stationary cars. Two streets ended at this yard, but there was a passway from one of these streets to the shops of another railroad company, aud this passway was used by men,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Rhodes v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
3Cited by32 opinions
- Ryan v. TowarMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Bailey v. North Carolina R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Brewer v. GittingsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Savannah, Florida & Western Rwy. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.