Legal Opinion

Faith v. Massengill

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 6, 1961No. 38990PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Judge.

It is the contention of counsel for the minor defendant that as a matter of law an eight year old child cannot be guilty of actionable, primary negligence; and that, accordingly, the plaintiff’s petition as to this defendant failed to state a cause of action. Counsel, however, has cited no cases in support of this contention; and we have been unable to find any in the reported cases of the appellate courts of this State or of other jurisdictions.

Both this court and the Supreme Court, on numerous occasions, have decided the question of whether or not a child of tender years is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Rwy. Co. v. GravittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Crawford v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Huckabee v. GraceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Augusta Amusements, Inc. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Lamar v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Corley v. LewlessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Brady v. LewlessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Herrin v. LámarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. State v. OaksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Scarboro v. LaukCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API