Legal Opinion

Gabel v. Cambruzzi

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1992No. 68 W.D. Appeal Docket 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

The appellants herein, William and Karen Gabel, own a large tract of land, consisting of over seventeen acres, in the village of Darragh, Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania.

In or about 1890, a dam was constructed on the property now owned by the appellants for the purpose of retaining the stream which ran through the above-mentioned tract on its way to joining the Little Sewickley Creek. It was built to supply water for the nearby village of Darragh.

In the mid 1940’s, large cracks began to develop in the bed of the artificial lake, causing water to leak into abandoned…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Vattimo v. Lower Bucks Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cintas Corp. v. Lee's Cleaning Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Wilkinsburg Police Officers Ass'n ex rel. Harder v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Daddona v. ThorpeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Raykovitz v. K Mart Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Discover Bank v. Booker, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API