Legal Opinion

Raykovitz v. K Mart Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1995No. 497PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge.

This is a direct appeal from the trial court’s order sustaining appellee’s preliminary objections and dismissing appellant’s complaint. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Plaintiff/appellant Raymond Raykovitz initially commenced an action by filing a complaint in the federal district court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania alleging that he was wrongfully discharged by K-Mart Corporation in violation of the public policy of Pennsylvania. Mr. Raykovitz had been collecting part-time Unemployment Compensation from a previous full-time job and working part-time at a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scarpitti v. WeborgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Highhouse v. Avery TransportationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Gabel v. CambruzziSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Shick v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Weaver v. HarpsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Rothrock v. Rothrock Motor Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. McLaughlin v. Gastrointestinal Specialists, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Davenport v. ReedCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API