Legal Opinion
Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1992No. Nos. 91-1609 and 91-2339PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue before us is what portion, if any, of the fees in question may be included in the companies’ EFC rates. R.C. 4909.191 governs EFC proceedings and provides in part:
“(C) The electric light company shall demonstrate at the hearing on its fuel component that its acquisition and delivery costs were fair, just, and reasonable. * * * ”
R.C. 4905.01(G) defines “fuel component” as:
“ * * * acquisition and delivery costs of fuel for the generation of electricity, including the allowable costs of purchased power as defined in section 4909.159 of the Revised Code * *
R.C. 4905.01(E) defines…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Industrial Energy Consumers of Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Indus. Energy Consumers of Ohio Power Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994