Legal Opinion

Roman-Hutchinson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 2009No. 2112 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge FRIEDMAN.

Samantha Roman-Hutchinson. (Claimant) petitions for review of the September 24; 2008, order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR), which dismissed as untimely Claimant’s appeal from a referee’s decision denying Claimant unemployment compensation (UC) benefits. We affirm.

On April 21, 2008, Claimant was discharged from her employment, and, thereafter, a local job center denied her application for UC benefits. Claimant appealed to a referee, who affirmed the denial of benefits by a decision and order dated June 17, 2008. On the same day, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bass v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Cook v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Perry v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Blast Intermediate Unit 17 v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Renda v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Chartiers Community Mental Health & Retardation Center v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Bennett v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. v. Departmnet of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Chapman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. A.H. Reaves v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API