Legal Opinion

Cook v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 1996No. 7 W.D. Appeal Docket 1995PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

The issue raised by this case is whether an appellant before the unemployment compensation board who files an appeal four days late because he was hospitalized may be allowed to appeal nunc pro tunc.

*383Appellant Cook worked for Hussey Copper Corporation from April 1984 until April 1992, when he was terminated. He applied for unemployment compensation benefits and was denied on the grounds that his termination was based on willful misconduct. He was given notice that he had fifteen days, or until May 8,1992, to appeal the denial of benefits to a referee.

Cook…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Bass v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. West Penn Power Company v. GoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. In Re the Interest of C.K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. Criss v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. StockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Russo v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. H.D. v. Pennsylvania Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Fischer v. UPMC NorthwestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API