Renda v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
In these consolidated appeals, sixty-three similarly situated Claimants question whether the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) erred in determining they were ineligible for benefits under Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law1 (Law) (voluntary leave without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature). Because we agree Claimants’ beliefs concerning future layoffs were speculative and Employer demonstrated continuing work was available to Claimants, we affirm.
Claimants are former Verizon (Employer) employees, with an average length of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McCarthy v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Peoples First National Bank v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Philadelphia Parking Authority v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Staub v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Stana v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Roman-Hutchinson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Constantini v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- ATM Corp. of America v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Diehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (ESAB Group, Inc.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.