Hengartner v. Chet Swanson Sales, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtE. A. Quinnell, J.
In this action, plaintiff sought to recover for injuries allegedly caused by defendant’s failure to adequately repair the brakes of her automobile. The circuit court held that plaintiff had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1) was granted. Plaintiff appeals as of right.
A motion for summary judgment under this subrule tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint. It must be resolved by treating as true all wellpled factual allegations and determining whether the claims made are so clearly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Hart v. LudwigMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Browder v. International Fidelity InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Fuhrmann v. HattawayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Campbell v. SullinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Nelson v. NORTHWESTERN S & L ASS'NMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Nelson v. Northwestern Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Universal Underwriters Insurance v. KneelandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Celina Mutual Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.