Legal Opinion

Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Kneeland

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 1999No. Docket 201034PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Plaintiffs, Universal Underwriters Insurance Company and Betten Toyota, appeal by leave granted the circuit court’s order affirming the district court’s grant of summary disposition to defendant, Nancy Kneeland. We reverse and remand.

The facts are undisputed. On November 15, 1993, defendant took her car to Betten Toyota to be repaired. On November 16, 1993, Betten Toyota loaned defendant a “courtesy car,” a 1991 Previa, while her car was being repaired. On that date, defendant and a Betten Toyota employee signed a form entitled “Courtesy Car Agreement” that stated five terms:

1. Rental fee…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. National Ben Franklin Insurance v. Bakhaus Contractors, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Hengartner v. Chet Swanson Sales, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Kinnunen v. BohlingerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. KneelandMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Michigan Educational Employees Mutual Insurance v. TurowMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Scarff Brothers, Inc. v. Bischer Farms, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. KneelandMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. KneelandMichigan Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API