Legal Opinion

Celina Mutual Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1990No. 83892, (Calendar No. 4)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArcher, J.

The issue presented is whether a motor vehicle no-fault insurer, pursuant to the omnibus clause of its no-fault policy, should be held liable for all or part of a settlement a landowner’s general liability insurer pays where an injury arising out of the use of a motor vehicle occurs on the landowner’s premises. We hold the no-fault insurer has no duty to indemnify the general liability insurer because the landowner’s conduct did not arise from the use of a motor vehicle and was beyond the scope of the no-fault policy.

i

Shell Oil Company contracted with Ernest E. Kuhns, doing business as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Johnston v. Hartford InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Long Island Lighting Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gyarmati v. BielfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Celina Mutual Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Gyarmati v. BielfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API