Legal Opinion

City of Corsicana v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1952No. 3015PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, Justice.

This case involves the alleged invalidity of a penal ordinance duly passed by the governing body of the City of Corsicana. If the ordinance violates the due process clause of the Federal or State Constitution and if its attempted enforcement against appellees will result in irreparable injury tO' their vested property rights, the judgment appealed from should be affirmed; otherwise, the judgment should be reversed.

The record before us discloses that ap-pellees own certain real property situated in the business section of the City of Cor-sicana which they have used for many years…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. Austin City Cemetery Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Ex Parte SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Town of Ascarate v. VillalobosTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Kemp Hotel Operating Co. v. City of Wichita FallsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  5. Bielecki v. City of Port ArthurTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Beaty v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. City of Houston v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API