Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Sterling
Texas Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1932No. 6322PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge LEDDY
of the Commission of Appeals delivered the opinion for the court.
This is an original habeas corpus proceeding. We adopt the following from the brief filed by the Attorney General in behalf of relators as a correct statement of the facts involved:
“On August 31, 1932, J. H. McCulloch and J. L. McCulloch, and others,. all residents of Navarro County, Texas, presented a bill in equity to the Honorable H. F. Kirby, Judge of the 77th Judicial District, who was sitting temporarily in the 13th Judicial District of Navarro County. Petitioners were complaining of Rufus Pevehouse as…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- State v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. State ex rel AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1933
- Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. Ferguson KirbyTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Smith v. DeckerTexas Supreme Court · 1958
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.