Legal Opinion
Von Hatzfeld v. Neece
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 26, 1920No. 9462PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.
This appeal is from an order of the district court of Palo Pinto county refusing to wholly vacate á temporary writ of injunction theretofore issued upon the petition of the appellees in this case. The material allegations of the appellees’ petition, which form the basis of the temporary writ that had been issued, are as follows:
“Plaintiffs further allege that said property •is in a very desirable residence portion of the city of Mineral Wells, Tex.; in fact, one of the best in said city; that said street is one of the most public thoroughfares in the city; that plaintiffs Neece and Miller…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. OakesTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Dunn v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Rosser v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
- Shamburger v. ScheurrerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- City of Richmond v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marshall v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- City of Abilene v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Dickson v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921