Legal Opinion
City of Richmond v. House
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided November 20, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
William Rogers Clay, Commissioner
— Affirming.
The city of Richmond brought this suit against A. J. House and Ed. Million, to enjoin them from operating certain stock yards or cattle pens, on the ground that they would prove a public nuisance. Being denied the relief prayed for, the city appeals.
The building where the stock yards are conducted is located on the corner of East Main street and Big T-Till avenue, in the city of Richmond. Prior to its purchase by appellees, it was used as a loose-leaf tobacco ware-*815*Ü&nse. No stock of any kind were ever slaughtered on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Monticello v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- St. James' Church v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Pfingst v. SennCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
- Albany Christian Church v. WilbornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Commonwealth v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co. v. LiddleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Board of Education of Louisville v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Commonwealth v. Phoenix Amusement Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Emrich v. MarcucilliCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Von Hatzfeld v. NeeceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.