Legal Opinion

Dunn v. City of Austin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1889No. 6910PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from Travis. Tried below before Hon. W. M. Key.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

—-The petition in this cause, on demurrer, was held insufficient, and there being no request for leave to amend, the injunction granted in chambers was dissolved and the bill dismissed. From that judgment this appeal is prosecuted, and that the averments of this bill may be understood we have inserted it. It is as follows:

“1. Your petitioners, M. S. Dunn, H. A. Fitzhugh, Levi Scott, William Wellmer, and Vories P. Brown, all of whom reside in Travis County, Texas, complaining of the city of Austin and J. G. Palm and Swante Palm, who reside in the State and county,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adams v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  2. Kingsbury v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Thebaut v. CanovaSupreme Court of Florida · 1867
  4. St. James' Church v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  5. Jung v. NerazTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. City of Waco v. RookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Rea v. Tacoma Mausoleum Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Elliott v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Sanders v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API