Legal Opinion
Rollins Burdick Hunter of Southern California, Inc. v. Alexander & Alexander Services, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 22, 1988No. B031686PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting the motion of defendants Alexander & Alexander Services, Inc. (A & A Services) and John Bogardus to quash service of summons for lack of jurisdiction.
Facts
Plaintiffs, Rollins Burdick Hunter of Southern California (RBH Southern California) and Rollins Burdick Hunter Co., 2 sued a number of defendants for breach of agreement authorized by statute, interference with contractual relations, unfair competition, breach of fiduciary duty and fraudulent conversion. All causes of action included the following allegations: Plaintiff RBH…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Cornelison v. ChaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Sibley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Secrest MacHine Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Doe v. Unocal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Calvert v. HuckinsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1995
- Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Doe v. Unocal Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.