Legal Opinion

Clark v. Village of Woodmere

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1985No. 49451PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, P.J.

The defendant-village appeals from a declaratory judgment that the plaintiff-landowner may build a residence on a plot consisting of two adjoining parcels. In so ruling, the trial court held that the village’s zoning ordinances unconstitutionally restricted the minimum area and width for this residential property. The landowner failed to present sufficient evidence to support that conclusion, so we reverse and dismiss the action.

The trial evidence consisted of (a) brief testimony by the plaintiff-landowner, (b) the village’s zoning map and zoning ordinances, and (c) minutes from village…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CochraneOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Pyromatics, Inc. v. PetruzielloOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Erie Insurance Group v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. City of Pepper Pike v. LandskronerOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beck v. Springfield Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Schreiner v. Russell Township Board of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Parkstone Capital Partners v. SolonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Village of Boston Heights v. Cerny, 23331 (6-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. City of Mayfield Heights v. CardarelliOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API