Legal Opinion

City of Mayfield Heights v. Cardarelli

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1989No. Nos. 55771, 55884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Roland W. Riggs, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee, city of Mayfield Heights (the “city”) filed a complaint for injunctive relief against defendant-appellant Augustine Cardarelli, d.b.a. Cardarelli Landscaping (“Cardarelli”) and defendant-appellant Howard Sonenstein, d.b.a. B & B Landscaping. The city alleged that appellants were in violation of Section 1189.13 of the zoning code, which prohibits the storing of commercial vehicles on residential premises within the city.

The matter was submitted to the trial court on stipulations and briefs. Upon review the trial court held that appellants were in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Village of Hudson v. Albrecht, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Consolidated Management, Inc. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Brown v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. City of Pepper Pike v. LandskronerOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adair v. NortonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Parma v. BambeckOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API