Legal Opinion
Schmittinger v. Schmittinger
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 1988No. 87-83, 87-84PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Before us for a second time is a dispute concerning the correct interpretation of a separation agreement entered into in 1968 by Harold C. Schmittinger and Ruby M. Schmittinger. They were divorced four years later, and Mrs. Schmittinger remarried. In the first appeal, we held that Husband 1 was obliged to continue making support payments for both Wife and their minor children notwithstanding her remarriage. Schmittinger v. Schmittinger, 404 A.2d 967 (D.C.1979). The youngest of such children has now reached the age of majority. Prior thereto (indeed prior to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hill v. HawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc. v. Smithsonian InstituteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Ali Baba Co., Inc. v. Wilco, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Minick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Nicholas Cavalliotis, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Supreme Navigation Corporation, Bankrupt v. Robert Salomon and Atlantis Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- D.D. v. M.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
- District of Columbia v. WatkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.