Legal Opinion
Minick v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 25, 1986No. 83-1225PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant, Willie L. Minick, was convicted after a jury trial of first-degree felony murder (D.C. Code § 22-2401 (1981)), and rape (id. § 22-2801). On appeal, his central contention is that certain physical evidence seized from his home at the time of his arrest should have been suppressed as fruits of an unlawful warrantless entry and arrest. Appellant also argues that the trial court committed reversible error by allowing certain allegedly prejudicial evidence to be admitted at trial.
I
Appellant’s suppression argument was previously considered by this court in Minick v. United States, 455…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Harold B. Dorman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Lawrence T. Day. United States of America v. Eric J. SheffeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Ronald R. Moore, United States of America v. Perseval BrightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Weinberg v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ali v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re Baby Boy C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Busey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.