McIntyre v. Austin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.
The appellant contends a plaintiff cannot obtain a valid ■alias or pluries summons without first applying for and obtaining an order directing the issuance of such writ.
Chapter 66, Public Laws of 1927, required the Clerk of the Superior Court to issue an alias or pluries summons within three days after the ■“return of a summons unserved for want of time to make service, as to any defendant or defendants not served.” The imposition of this duty -on the Clerks of our Superior Courts was eliminated by the repeal of this provision in the statute by the enactment of Chapter 237 of the Public Laws…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hatch v. Alamance Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Hatch v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Mintz v. . FrinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Neely v. . MinusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- McGuire v. Montvale Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Morton v. Blue Ridge Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- McIntyre v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Am. Mech., Inc. v. BosticNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014