Legal Opinion
McIntyre v. Austin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 24, 1950No. 604PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
59 S.E.2d 586 (1950)
232 N.C. 186
McINTYRE
v.
AUSTIN.
No. 604.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 24, 1950.
James W. Mason, Laurinburg, and Smathers & Carpenter, Charlotte, for plaintiff.
Varser, McIntyre & Henry, Lumberton, for defendant.
DENNY, Justice.
The appellant contends a plaintiff cannot obtain a valid alias or pluries summons without first applying for and obtaining an order directing the issuance of such writ.
Chapter 66, Public Laws of 1927, required the Clerk of the Superior Court to issue an alias or pluries summons within three days after the "return of a summons unserved for want of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hatch v. Alamance Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Hatch v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Mintz v. . FrinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Neely v. . MinusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- McGuire v. Montvale Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Morton v. Blue Ridge Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Am. Mech., Inc. v. BosticNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014