Legal Opinion
Garwick v. Gordon
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1953No. Civ. 19577PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
In December, 1948, Messrs. Garwick and Gordon were granted a bottler’s license by Cock ’n Bull Products, Incorporated, whereby they became the exclusive licensees for the bottling and distribution of the beverages of the'lieensor in Southern California. For such franchise or license they paid $500 cash and agreed to pay a balance of $14,500 in installments. On January 5,1949, they executed articles of copartnership to continue in force for a period of 10 years. Also, their writing provided for the formation of a corporation with the name of “Ginger Beer Bottlers, Ltd.,” hereinafter referred…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Whann v. DoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Hunt v. PlavsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Helvey v. Security-First Nat. Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Arruda v. ArrudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Williams v. Inglewood Board of Realtors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Coleman v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Chazan v. MostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962