Legal Opinion

Barber-Coleman Co. v. A. G. Redmond Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1938No. 7281PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The patent involved in the present infringement suit is No. 1,822,679, to *718Stewart and Lilja, granted September 8, 1931. It relates to an induction motor of fractional horse power of the shading ring core type for use with alternating current. Infringement not being denied, validity is the sole issue. The court below found the patent anticipated and dismissed the bill.

The claims cover a combination of elements in the electrical art, wherein control of force is as often, explained by theory subject to controversy as upon principles universally accepted. The difficulty of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  2. Page Steel & Wire Co. v. Smith Bros. Hardware Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  3. Dunham v. Kelley-Koett Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  4. Banning v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Enterprise Mfg. Co. v. Shakespeare Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  2. Pullman Inc. v. ACF Industries Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. Barber-Colman Co. v. Sampsel Time Control, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1948
  4. The Muter Company v. The Magnavox CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  5. Scientific Tablet Co. v. OssegeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API