Legal Opinion

Scientific Tablet Co. v. Ossege

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 26, 1940No. 1600Published

1Opinion of the Court

KLOEB, District Judge.

Plaintiff claims infringement of United States Patent No. 1,887,073, involving a method of flavoring in canning, preserving and .bottling operations and asks an injunction, accounting of profits and damages and costs.

Defendant denies the validity of the patent and denies that plaintiff was the original, first or sole inventor of a method of flavoring in canning. »

Plaintiff claims that its assignor, Suppiger, has devised a new process for use in Jhe commercial canning industry and for use particularly in the commercial canning of tomatoes, whereby the method of salting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. United States Mitis Co. v. Midvale Steel Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Kirchberger v. American Acetylene Burner Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1903
  5. Buffalo Forge Co. v. City of BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API