Legal Opinion

Banning v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1937No. 7091PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant owns Edelman patent No. 1,-680,370, issued August 14, 1928, on application made March 23, 1925, for a “radio power supply unit,” and brought the usual infringement suit against the vendor of receiving sets manufactured by the Colonial Radio Corporation. While both validity and infringement were in issue, the court below, finding infringement not established, thought it unnecessary to pass upon validity of the patent and entered a decree dismissing the bill. This appeal followed.

The claims in suit have heretofore been litigated in the Seventh Circuit, where a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
  2. Directoplate Corp. v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  3. Columbia Motor Car Co. v. C. A. Duerr & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  4. Hartman Furniture & Carpet Co. v. BanningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  5. Wessel v. United Mattress Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barber-Coleman Co. v. A. G. Redmond Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  2. Howe v. AtwoodDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API