Legal Opinion

United States v. Jim Nicoll

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1982No. 80-7363PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Jim Nicoll was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to possess and distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. On appeal he contends: 1) that venue was improper, 2) that the trial court erred in admitting statements of a co-conspirator, 3) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction, 4) that he was entrapped as a matter of law, and 5) that his withdrawal from the conspiracy prohibited his conviction. We reject these contentions and affirm the conviction.

I. Background

On August 2, 1978, Frank Ader contacted the Atlanta Drug…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. United States v. Stanley Weisz, United States of America v. Eugene Robert CiuzioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Harold Donald HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Bennie Ray Winship, A/K/A Nip, and Jerry BiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Clark N. FischelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Harold Haimowitz, Dan Scarborough, George L. OnettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API