Legal Opinion
United States v. Harold Haimowitz, Dan Scarborough, George L. Onett
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 5, 1984No. 82-3009PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge:
Defendants Harold Haimowitz, Dan Scarborough, and George L. Onett were indicted on twenty counts. Count One charged that each of the defendants conspired to defraud by using and causing to be used the United States Postal Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1341. Count Two charged that each of the defendants conspired to obstruct interstate commerce by extortion in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951. Count Three charged that defendant Hai-mowitz obstructed and attempted to obstruct interstate commerce by extortion in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951. Count Four…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- McCormick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. NyhuisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. StarrettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- E.K. Wilcox, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. J. Paul Ford, Warden, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.