Legal Opinion

Dailey v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1924No. 24,498PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilloughby, J.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of transporting intoxicating liquor. The trial was by the court without a jury and the defendant was found guilty as charged and fined in the sum of $150 and sentenced to jail for thirty days. The trial was upon a plea of not guilty.

*684The appellant alleges error in the overruling of his motion for a new trial. The appellant claims that the court erred in its ruling upon certain exceptions to the admission of evidence, but in his brief, under “Points and Authorities,” he does not designate any place in the record where such exceptions may be found.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Wrassman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. McMurban v. HannumIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. McCrocklin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Koscielski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Murphy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State v. MarshallPiqua Municipal Court · 1952
  5. French v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API