Legal Opinion
State v. Marshall
Piqua Municipal Court
Decided February 15, 1952No. 6411PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By CROMER, J.
On February 5, 1952, an affidavit was filed in this court against the defendant, who was charged with the violation of §6367-19 (a) GC. This is one of the sections of The Uniform Traffic Act and charges the defendant with operating a vehicle while “under the influence of intoxicating liquor.”
The affidavit was signed by James Zimpher, a police officer of the City of Piqua. There is nothing on the face of the affidavit which is unusual. The case, in the regular order of court business, was set for arraignment at 3:00 P. M. on Tuesday, Fegruary 5, 1952. At the time of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Michigan Trust Co. v. FerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Commonwealth v. GormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- State v. DeitzWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Oleson v. PincockUtah Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Childress v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- State v. Foster, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1979
- Huth v. WoodardOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
- State v. Jenkins, Ashtabula County Courts, Ohio1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.