Legal Opinion

Wrassman v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1921No. 23,977PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, C. J.

Appellant was tried by court and convicted of violating the Prohibition Law, Acts 1917 p. 15, §8356a et seq. Burns’ Supp. 1918. • One count of the affidavit charged .-appellant with keeping intoxicat*401ing liquor with intent to sell. The affidavit was in several counts. The finding does not indicate on which count it is based. If the evidence is sufficient on any count, it must be on the one referred to above.

In brief the evidence is: As three police officers of Indianapolis drove in an automobile in front of a pool room on the south side of East Washington street, they saw appellant leave the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Cavender v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hamilton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ruetz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Spears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Christen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Spears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Stice v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API