Legal Opinion

McMurban v. Hannum

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1916No. 22,402PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Pike Circuit Court; John L. Brets, Judge. Action by Francis T. MeMurran and others against Mattie Hannum. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCox, C. J.

— This appeal is from a judgment of the lower court ordering a probate of the will of Marshall McMurran, deceased, pursuant to the verdict on issues formed on objections filed to the probate under the provisions of §3153 Burns 1914, §2595 B. S. 1881.

1. The only error well assigned is the first, which asserts that the trial court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial. The second and third assignments of error, which challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict, are not proper independent assignments of error. They are matters which must be presented on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Wagoner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Harris v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburg Railroad v. WolcottIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Kist v. CoughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Washington Hotel Realty Co. v. Bedford Stone & Construction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Crouch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API