Legal Opinion
United States v. Cimino
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided December 16, 2003No. 4:03M97-WCSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHERRILL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Bernadette Marvel and Raymond Marvel have moved for a protective order. The motion asks the court to quash a Rule 45 subpoena, to sanction the United States and counsel, or to transfer this matter to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Counsel not admitted to practice
Counsel for movants are not admitted to practice in this district. The motion is denied without prejudice for that reason. However, rather than delay this discovery for further litigation on the subject, the court will also adjudicate other issues raised by the motion.
Failure to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Windsor v. MartindaleDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997
- Syposs v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bavelis v. DoukasDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
- Maurer v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019