Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Whitely, Fasler & Kelly Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1889No. 13,856PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

On the 13th day of November, 1883, the appellee, by a written contract of that daté, appointed the appellant as its agent to sell farming implements in the territory of Fountain county, Indiana, the agency to continue from that date until August 1st, 1884. The contract between the parties stipulated that when implements or machines were sold the appellant should become responsible therefor, and should secure the payment for the same as follows : One-third September 1st, 1884, one-third January 1st, 1885, and one-third September 1st, 1885.

The contract further stipulated that all implements and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vogel v. LeichnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Cupp v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Dodge v. KinzyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Brown v. WillIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Dickerson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Voreis v. NussbaumIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Field v. NoblettIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Cummings v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Crisman v. LeonardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Davis v. NeighborsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API