Darlington v. Reilly

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

This is the- third time that this litigation has been before us in some phase or other: see 358 Pa. 380, 57 A. *5802d 861, and 363 Pa. 72, 69 A. 2d 84. And, like the last preceding occasion, the appellants are not parties to the litigation. Then, they were “would-be intervenors” whose petition for leave to intervene had been denied by the court below. Now, they are disappointed claimants, the denial of whose claims against the trust res or the trustee-receiver is the grievance of their present appeal. The factual background leading up to and during most of the…