Legal Opinion

Palethorp v. Palethorp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 1898No. Appeal, No. 319PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal, No. 319, Jan. T., 1897, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June T., 1894,. No. 1702, dismissing exceptions to master’s report. Bill in equity for partition. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to master’s-report.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Williams,

The rules regulating the practice in equity in the several? courts of this commonwealth were amended by this Court on. the 15th day of January, 1894, and it was then ordered that the said amendments should take effect on the first Monday of' the March following, and be applicable to all causes in equity brought, or put at issue, after that date. Among these amendments was one which provided as follows: “ The office of master-in chancery is hereby discontinued except in proceedings where decrees or interlocutory orders are to be executed or their execution…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Yetter v. Delaware Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Hinnershitz v. United Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Lincoln v. AfricaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Arcadia Theatre Co. v. SabloskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Rowley v. RowleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API